← o1

o1: capability breakdown

99.7 / 220

measured 13 of 22 rungs · effort row: default (the median of its published effort settings)

This page shows where the number comes from. Each rung is one public benchmark, worth up to 10 points times the model's chance-corrected score on it; the score is the sum of all 22 rungs. How the capability ladder works explains the rungs, the fit and its limits.

Rung (easiest → hardest) Points / 10 How Source date
HumanEval 9.54 measured 2024-10-05
MMLU 8.77 measured 2024-10-05
MATH-500 9.47 measured 2025-04-14
MMLU-Pro 8.46 fitted
AIME 2024 9.55 fitted
AIME 2025 8.23 fitted
LiveCodeBench 6.79 measured 2026-09-05
GPQA Diamond 5.59 measured 2024-10-05
IFBench 7.03 measured 2026-04-16
τ²-Telecom 6.26 measured 2026-04-16
AA-LCR 5.93 measured 2026-04-16
Terminal-Bench 2.1 2.89 fitted
SciCode 3.58 measured 2026-04-16
Terminal-Bench Hard 1.29 measured 2026-04-16
AutomationBench 0.54 fitted
AA-Briefcase (rubric pass) 0.63 fitted
HLE 0.30 measured 2026-04-16
MLCR 0.12 fitted
τ³-Banking 0.85 fitted
Omniscience acc. 3.47 measured 2026-04-16
CritPt 0.03 measured 2026-04-16
GDP.pdf 0.38 fitted
Total 99.70 = 99.7 / 220

Measured rows are the model's own published result on that benchmark. fitted rows are an item-response estimate: what a model with this ability would be expected to score on a benchmark it has no published result for (see the methodology).

Per-benchmark results are Artificial Analysis's (public model pages); fitted values are this site's estimates. Permission to republish requested 2026-09-05.